<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>billso.com - Latest Comments in Back on track</title><link>http://billso.disqus.com/</link><description>Mobile technology, information security, and more</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:53:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Back on track</title><link>http://billso.com/2008/04/17/back-on-track/#comment-4623252</link><description>Check my post on &lt;a href="http://billso.com/2008/04/20/enough-already" rel="nofollow"&gt;20 April 2008&lt;/a&gt; for the Honolulu newspapers' editorials on this decision.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:53:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back on track</title><link>http://billso.com/2008/04/17/back-on-track/#comment-4623251</link><description>The &lt;a href="http://starbulletin.com/2008/04/20/editorial/editorial01.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Honolulu Star-Bulletin's lead editorial&lt;/a&gt; today asks the City Council to let steel-on-steel rail go forward. Their opportunity to make this decision has passed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The editorial's description of Wednesday night's meeting is apt:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Only two members voted for a bewildering bill naming three technologies -- rail, rubber-tire and magnetic levitation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Council is likely to remain irrelevant...&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">billso</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:34:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>